Carr Fire’s Urban Residential Destruction: A Design for Disaster?

The Carr Fire burned 229,651 acres and 1079 residences; about 800 in the Shasta County area, and the remaining number inside the Redding city limits.

My friends Steve Iverson, Terry Stinson and I have spent several days looking at the portion of the Carr Fire burn where it entered the City of Redding. This would be the urban portion of the Wildland Urban Interface. That part of our town is newer construction, high-end subdivision homes built to California Fire Safe Standards; that is, non-flammable roofs, stucco siding and all the rest of the State’s requirements.

How then, did we lose almost 300 of those homes in one wildfire?

Many of these homes were built right on the edge of the Sacramento River canyon -- on finger ridges to maximize the view, or on the rim of side draws -- anything to maximize the view aspect of the property and capture the afternoon up-canyon wind flow. Most had large concrete patios, and some had pools. There were no wooden decks extending over the canyon that I saw.

The canyon is about ½ mile across where the most houses burned, with slope estimated around 100-percent slope. The aspect where most of the homes burned is a west-facing slope, meaning that it catches the afternoon sun, and preheats the forest fuels.

The canyon itself was predominately filled with manzanita 12-to-15 feet high ( 75 percent) and the remainder was oak woodland, with scattered ceonothus brush and poison oak . The brush field was approximately 75 years old, having sprouted after Shasta Dam was completed in 1945. Available fuel loading ranged from 1-3 tons/acre in the Oak Woodland to 13 tons/acre in the heavy brush. All herbaceous material was cured and live fuel moisture was apportionment 80 percent in manzanita -- right at the critical level  -- which means that it will burn as if it's a dead fuel, not a live one.

A Carr Fire cloud brewing a firenado in a Redding subdivision. Photo by Parvin Carter.

So, we’ve got a canyon filled with tons and tons of very flammable brush on an extremely steep slope with hundreds of very pricey homes perched on the rim, on a day when the temperature was 112 degrees and relative humidity was around 9 percent. To repeat a phrase from the 1960s, this was a “Design For Disaster”. (That was the title of fire training film describing the events of the Bel Air fire in Los Angeles County in 1961. Fire geeks can Google it and watch).

"Design for Disaster" film depicts the 1961 Bel-Air Fire, including evacuations.

We can determine how things burned by looking at burn patterns and other forensic evidence. For those who did this for a living it's like reading a book. It was easy to figure out why the houses on the rim burned: They were looking right down the barrel of a blowtorch. Even though these homes were built with fire-resistant construction, many had loaded their patios with flammable lawn furniture, tiki bars and flammable ornamental plants. Palm trees became flaming pillars. Shredded bark became the fuse. Junipers became napalm bombs.

Under current standards house are build six to an acre; 10 feet to the property line, and only 20 feet between houses. Once one house ignited, radiant heat could easily torch the next one.

We followed burned-up wood fence trails from lot to lot. Wooden fences were nothing more than upright piles of kindling wood, and then into some ornamental shrubbery with an under-story of shredded bark, which torched and set the next house on fire. The fire progressed away from the canyon rim, no longer a wildland fire, but a series of house fires, each contributing to the ignition of the next one.

Firefighter battles Carr Fire in a Redding subdivision. Photo by Mike Daly.

We noted several -- perhaps as many as a half dozen homes -- that burned from the ground up. Fire entered the building at the point where the stucco outer-wall joined the slab, and wind pushed fire into the decorative bark, which ignited and then forced itself into the foam insulation and composition board sheeting under the stucco. Normally a fire in decorative bark is not a problem; it simply smolders. But in this case -- where literally every burning ember was starting a spot fire and those spot fires were fanned by 100-mph in-draft winds -- those smoldering fires were fanned into open flames which burned the homes. A simple piece of flashing could have prevented some of that loss.

We built homes to a fire resistant standard, and them compromised them.

The fire hit Redding on an approximately 2-mile front. It spotted across the Sacramento River in several locations and spread rapidly in the canyon, spawning numerous fire whirls. The updrafts caused the convection column to rotate, generating firestorm winds estimated at 140 mph.

Carr Fire photo from west Redding by Matt Grigsby.

I’d guess most of the homes that were lost burned in the first hour after the fire crossed the river. The fire and rescue services were overwhelmed.

The City of Redding allowed home construction on canyon rims, places that have proven to be fire traps over the years in almost every community where this construction has been allowed. Houses built in those exposed areas are similar to house built in a flood zone. It's not a question if they will burn. The question is, when.

Carr Fire house fire by Mike Daly.

These subdivisions had limited egress. In one high-priced gated subdivision there is only one way in or out. Redding planners have seemingly ignored the lessons from past disasters, like the Tunnel Fire in Oakland Hills in 1991, where 2,900 homes burned and 25 people died.

The city's green belts have proven to be nothing but time bombs; fuel-choked canyons that are a haven for the homeless. How many fire starts have we had in the canyon below Mercy Hospital, or in Sulfur Creek below Raley’s on Lake Boulevard? The homeless problem has exacerbated the fire problem. The fuels are there; the homeless provide the starts.

Even today, new subdivisions are being built overlooking the burned-out canyons, and looking across the rim at the ruins of homes burned in the Carr Fire.

The Sacramento River canyon will regrow, and it will be more flammable next time. Noxious weeds, and stumps sprouting brush will germinate in the burned area. The skeletons of the burned trees will become available fuel. In a couple of years the fuel bed will be more receptive to fire than it was before the Carr Fire.

If we don’t learn from our mistakes, we are doomed to repeat them.

Royal Burnett is retired from the California Department of Forestry and has lived in Redding for 40 years. 

Click here for more fire stories.  
Comment Policy: We welcome your comments, with some caveats: Please keep your comments positive and civilized. If your comment is critical, please make it constructive. If your comment is rude, we will delete it. If you are constantly negative or a general pest, troll, or hater, we will ban you from the site forever. The definition of terms is left solely up to us. Comments are disabled on articles older than 90 days. Thank you. Carry on.

7 Responses

  1. Beverly Stafford says:

    Very informative. We were watching the Castaic fire on television a day or two ago, and my comment was that if I ruled the world, I’d have a quarter-mile firebreak surrounding all rural residential areas, then let the fire burn in order to be rid of all the highly flammable fuel. The Indians if 1800’s had it right: set their summer campground afire when leaving for winter camp then do it again when leaving winter camp. California will become one big, black cinder if we don’t do thousands of careful prescribed burns.

  2. Thank you, Mr. Burnett, for this sobering piece of writing.
    (Readers, I added a link to the 1962-produced film, “Design for Disaster” — above. It was pretty chilling, and had a very familiar ring to it. )

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhC4mkLqvN0

  3. The Carr Fire happening is not so mysterious as is why it did happen sooner and more often. Three years ago FEMA paid City of Redding to produce a document concerning fires, floods and hazardous material. This reading is available at http://www.cityofredding.org/home/show document?id=5627

    The portion dealing with fire is especially interesting post Carr Fire as the events of 26 July are foretold in some detail. There will be the usual denial, scapegoating and excuses; the required document is clear and convincing that reducing our surrounding fuel load was and remains mandatory, not discretionary. Who, why and how this document’s findings were not placed in an urgent category demanding action are the kinds of queries this local campaign season should be asking. Also, suggesting planners are solely responsible for one way gated entrances in an area adrift in vagrant illegal, drug using, alternative life style non contributors is as unfair as it is untruthful. Security conscious buyers and developers want that one way with break through alternatives because theft is somewhat discouraged by single entrance gates. Just sayin…

    Now is the time to plant a better future, join the solution in preventing future disasters, become involved in safe guarding homes and neighborhoods. Letting others carry this burden did not work before and it won’t work in the future.

  4. showdocument?id=5627 No space between “show” and “document”. Try it; you’ll like it!

  5. Can’t make it work! Just type the entry with no spaces and your browser will bring up the document. Enjoy!

  6. AJ AJ says:

    I am also reminded of the Laguna fire several years ago. Sounds like EXACTLY the same road map to disaster.
    We humans seem to be such slow learners!!

You must be a subscriber to comment. Click here to subscribe!