Front and Center: Kevin N. Knapp, commander of the Redding Detachment of the Sons of the American Revolution, and Catherine DeYoung with the Redding Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution, helped kick off “Constitution Week.”
Given that this great nation has been in a constitutional crisis basically since the day President Donald J. Trump descended that golden escalator 10 years ago, it’s fitting that the Shasta County Board of Supervisors declared September 17-23 Constitution Week. The annual observance of our founding documents was established by the Daughters of the American Revolution in 1956 and signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower.
Members of the Daughters of the American Revolution and the Sons of the American Revolution claim lineage stretching back to our revolutionary past, and if you browse their websites you’ll find it’s an inclusive past when it comes to gender and race, one the average MAGA today might call “woke.” That’s part of our history—at least for now!—and Catherine DeYoung with the Redding Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution and Kevin Knapp, commander of the Redding Detachment of the Sons of the American Revolution were on hand to add a bit of solemnness to the occasion.
“I’m the detachment commander of the Sacramento Chapter, the Sons of the American Revolution, working as hard as I can to reestablish the sons of American Revolution chapter here in this great area, which has been very active for many years in the past,” Knapp said. “We celebrate Constitution Week to remind us of all of the importance of informed citizenship and the enduring impact of our nation’s founding principles on our lives and our communities.”
District 5 Supervisor Chris Kelstrom sponsored Constitution Week.
R3 on the agenda, Constitution Week was sponsored by District 5 Supervisor Chris Kelstrom, who read the proclamation.
“It is fitting and proper to officially recognize this remarkable document, the anniversary of its creation, and the additions to it in the form of 27 amendments, as well as the patriotic celebrations which will commemorate it,” Kelstrom said. “Shasta County encourages all citizens to recognize and appreciate the importance of this enduring document and to reaffirm our commitment to the rights and responsibilities of citizenship in this great nation.”
Kelstrom sounds kinda woke! Maybe this Constitution stuff is rubbing off on him.
Chair Crye’s Charter to Nowhere
District 1 Supervisor Kevin Crye evades blame for Charter screw up.
A News Cafe correspondent and North State Breakdown news streamer Benjamin Nowain broke news earlier this week, revealing District 1 Supervisor Kevin Crye’s attempt on his Sunday radio show to blame the failure to file the proper paperwork for Measure D, the Charter County initiative the Board Chair personally championed to victory in the 2024 March Primary, on anybody but himself. Crye was still avoiding accountability on Tuesday.
Shasta County CEO David Rickert shortened his usually lengthy board report to mumble a few sentences about County Counsel Joe Larmour recently discovering that the paperwork for Measure D had never been filed with the county or the Secretary of State and subsequently sending the proper documents to Sacramento on Aug. 29. Until further notice, we are apparently no longer a charter county.
Who’s to blame? Rickert didn’t say.
Shasta County CEO David Rickert.
Chair Crye addressed the issue in a prepared statement at the end of his board report.
“I want to make sure we understand the Board votes to adopt an ordinance, the role of the individual board members is finished once that legislative action is taken,” Crye claimed. “It is important for the public to understand that board members do not carry out administrative responsibilities related to implementing or processing ordinances after their adoption. Instead, those responsibilities rest with county staff and designated departments, electeds, et cetera, who ensure that ordinances are properly filed, codified, and carried out in accordance with applicable law. This process helps maintain the clear separation between the board’s legislative role and the administrative duties of the county staff.”
Who’s to blame? Crye didn’t really say either.
The relevant legislation governing the issue, California Government Code 23713, states in full:
“Two copies of the complete text of a charter proposal or of any revised, amended, or repealed section ratified by the electors of a county shall be certified and authenticated by the chairperson and clerk of the governing body and attested by the county elections official, setting forth the submission of the charter to the electors of the county, and its ratification by them. The county elections official shall file the second copy with the Secretary of State along with the following:
(a) Certified copies of all publications and notices required of the county by this chapter or by the laws of this state in connection with an election to propose or revise a county charter.
(b) Certified copies of any arguments for or against the charter proposal or revision that were mailed to voters pursuant to Sections 9162 and 13303 of the Elections Code.
(c) A certified abstract of the vote at the election at which the charter proposal or revision was approved by the voters.”
Presuming the governing body is the Shasta County Board of Supervisors, the law seems to say that the chairperson of that body, Crye, and the Clerk of the Board, CEO Rickert, are responsible for certifying and authenticating two copies of the charter. They were then supposed to give the copies to the Registrar of Voters, who at the time was Assistant Registrar of Voters Joanne Francescut, filling in for the retired ROV Cathy Darling Allen. If they had done so, Francescut would have authenticated both copies, filing one with the county recorder and one with the Secretary of State.
Former Assistant ROV Joanne Francescut.
In a blistering Facebook post, Francescut exploded Crye’s assertions on last Sunday’s radio show.
“Let’s set the record straight: state law outlines the process of filing a County Charter, and it begins with the office of the Board of Supervisors submitting a recorded copy,” Francescut wrote. “This was not completed until after I was no longer working in the Elections Department.”
Francescut was fired by current ROV Clint Curtis in May, shortly after the Board chose Curtis over the far more experienced Francescut. In an email press release posted during Tuesday’s meeting, Curtis also pointed the finger at the Board for botching the charter county filing.
“Questions have arisen regarding the Election Department failing to file the appropriate documents with the state that are required for Shasta County to become a Charter County in 2024,” Curtis said. “The charter’s legal effect is contingent upon its acceptance and filing by the California Secretary of State. Evidently Shasta County did not file the appropriate documents. This has been confirmed with the Secretary of States Office.”
Crye was severely roasted during the open public comment session.
Steve Kohn thinks Chair Crye should self-terminate.
“I’m not normally a listener, but I did listen to the last radio program because of concerns people expressed to me, and I think it was a good thing, because on the radio program, he announced that we weren’t a charter county, and this was because paperwork could not be completed,” said Steve Kohn, a long time Crye-antagonist. “He said, this negligence was a fireable offense. I agree with you. Are you going to quit? Are you going to fire yourself because you as chair of the governing entity are responsible for firing that paperwork?”
Another frequent Crye foe, Jeff Gorder, expressed his disappointment in the Board Chair.
“I was very disappointed, but not surprised to hear Chair Crye blame everybody else for the charter failure, to take no responsibility himself,” Gorder said. “I’m reminded of Harry Truman, a great leader who supposedly said the buck stops here. That’s not what we have. And I wish Corkey was here, because again, I think he could see what a disastrous decision it was to reappoint Crye as chair. His toxic leadership is unbelievable.”
District 3 Supervisor Corkey Harmon was not in attendance.
Benjamin Nowain, the former county employee turned reporter/activist who has butted heads often with Crye, scoffed at the Chair’s blame-shifting.
“You helped write it, you campaigned on it, you celebrated its passage, and then failed to follow through,” Nowain said. “It’s not your mistake? Yeah. Okay.”
Amity Foundation Could Give Proposed Alternative Custody Program Humane Touch
Amity Foundation CEO and president Doug Bond pitched his organization’s services to the Board.
Slowly but surely, Shasta County Sheriff Michael Johnson’s plan to establish an Alternative Custody Program in south Redding is taking shape. Johnson first proposed the project in January as a rational solution to the perpetual lack of funding for a much-needed but long-delayed new jail. Last month the Board voted unanimously to approve a lease agreement with the City of Redding for the parcels at 7251 Eastside Road, Redding, and 7051 Eastside Road, Anderson, securing 90 acres for the program, which will serve low-level offenders.
According to Johnson, the 90-acre campus will be broken up into three different projects. One-third will be dedicated to the existing alternative custody currently located at Breslauer Lane in Redding. Another third will be dedicated to a residential re-entry program for low level offenders, such as the programs provided by Los Angeles-based Amity Foundation. Amity Foundation CEO and president Doug Bond pitched his organization’s wares at Tuesday’s meeting.
The nonprofit’s mission statement could be referring to the derelict denizens of downtown Redding:
“Amity Foundation is dedicated to the inclusion and habilitation of people marginalized by addiction, trauma, criminality, incarceration, poverty, racism, sexism, homelessness, and violence. We strive to improve health and promote environmental, social, and economic justice. Amity is committed to research, development, implementation, and dissemination of information regarding community building.”
Amity CEO Bond came up the hard way.
“I spent time in about a dozen foster homes, as a child,” Bond said. “Both of my parents were incarcerated, and the foundation got me out of foster care and I would not be here today if it was not for those kinds of long term investments in men and women who are coming home.”
Shasta County Sheriff Michael Johnson says he isn’t going soft on crime.
Both Bond and Johnson repeatedly stressed that violent offenders, sexual predators and other hardcore criminals are not eligible for Amnity’s residential program, which will include housing at the site. Johnson estimated that approximately one-third of the 400 inmates currently housed in the jail—its maximum capacity by law—will be eligible for the Alternative Custody Program, including the services offered by Amnity, should they be awarded a contract.
Launched in 2015, Amity currently has six locations in California totaling 662 beds. It’s seeking to add 511 more beds at five new locations.
“We don’t create institutional environments,” Bond said as a refurbished red brick apartment building appeared on the screen. “We want people to be in a rehabilitative environment, we really believe that the environment is part of the therapeutic process for individuals, so you’ll see just a few examples of buildings that we’ve converted. These are warehouses and other spaces that were really created to be safe.”
The four-phase program is tailored to inmates within 32 months of their release date. Approximately half will come from state prison, the other half will come from the jail. The aim is to keep the inmate population as local as possible so connections can be made with family members, schooling and job opportunities. All the residents will be closely monitored with ankle active electronic devices and there will be a large security presence on the Alternative Custody Program campus.
While Bond said the success of Amnity’s programs depend on partnerships between law enforcements and communities, the state will be providing significant funds to the project, since it serves both state prisoners and local jail inmates serving state time. It costs the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation $128,000 per year to house an inmate in prison; Amnity houses low-level offenders for half that amount, $63,000 per year.
Johnson said he’ll continue to use the word “incarcerate” instead of “house” and isn’t going soft on crime.
“I want to make it very clear, because people need to know,” Johnson said. “I’m not for just emptying out the jail and people who need to be in jail. There are a good percentage of criminals who do not care and all they want to do is victimize people.”
“What’s nice about the partnership that we’re forging here is we will maintain 100 percent authority of determining what parameters we set for sending people to this program,” Johnson continued. “So it’s not like a state or Doug’s foundation or anybody are going to dictate who we think should go to the program. That’ll be something that our staff comes up with and creates some interest to send and make that determination, and it’ll be on a case-by-case basis.”
What’s next? So far, the County has allocated about $1 million to the new Alternative Custody Program for an environmental impact study and other administrative costs. Redding still has to declare the parcels as surplus land. The Board voted 4-0 to request a proposal from Amnity Foundation, which will be forthcoming in the weeks ahead.
Happy Halloween: $1 Million in Cuts to SCOE Childcare Program?
District 4 Supervisor Matt Plummer: Trick or treat?
It doesn’t take all that much to send Chair Crye into a rampaging radio rant. Nothing makes his blood boil quite like the Shasta County Office of Education, especially since SCOE Superintendent Mike Freeman called out Crye for allegedly attempting to foist is NINJA Coalition education services on the countywide public school agency last year.
Last Sunday, it was the staff report for R6 on Tuesday’s agenda that apparently set Crye off. At issue was a retroactive renewal agreement with SCOE for the administration of state mandated child care and education services for the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Program (CalWORKS) in the amount of $4,860,060.
Here’s the paragraph in the staff report that so incensed Chair Crye:
“Since August 1998, SCOE has been consistently providing quality services to Shasta County families, and expected outcomes included in the previous contract were achieved by SCOE. Those expected outcomes were ensuring 90 percent of Stage One child care providers were licensed, ensuring no good cause exemptions occurred due to provider unavailability, and ensuring 100 percent of clients referred for Stage One child care services had an approved child care plan and received written notification of their approved plan in five days.”
Crye’s beef? It’s with the past. For him, if he wasn’t there, it didn’t happen.
“This is really more about why we have to look deeper, because when the staff report says something that since 1998, my thing was, well, who was working in HHSA in that department in 1998, that can attest to these great outcomes?” Crye said conspiratorially to District 4 Supervisor Matt Plummer.
During public comment on R6, Nowain once again nailed Crye to a T.
“You said on your show that you care about outcomes, but undermining SCOE on the air and suggesting a contract might be unjustified, demanding metrics without citing what is actually missing, that’s not oversight,” Nowain said. “It’s just messaging and performance. It’s a continuation of a narrative where you get to cast institutions as broken when they don’t align with your personal goals. The families served by these programs, they don’t care if someone said ‘phenomenal’ on a staff report. They care if a child remains funded, that the system works, and that the leaders are acting in good faith.”
Spot-on criticism.
Nevertheless, Plummer took Crye’s bait and ran with it. What followed was a mind-numbing conversation between Plummer and HHSA Administrative Branch Director Erinn Watts as they navigated the nebulous zone between projected budget and actual budget, where’s there’s a time lag of one year and invisible shifts in the unassigned budget surplus measured in the tens of millions of dollars.
“In the staff report, what I was reading is basically that our expenses exceed our revenue on a month-to-month basis by about a million dollars or so, 0.9 million,” Plummer said. “So if that’s true, that would suggest to me that basically every month we’re running this program, we’re losing money, and we’re going to have to then supplement that from other places. Is that more of where we are, or would you say, oh, we’re actually break-even or positive, but it’s just a timing thing?”
“So I would say it’s a little bit of both,” Watts said earnestly. “So I’ve kind of gone back and looked month over month, and there are definitely months where we have more revenue that’s coming in than our expenditures were, but it’s more often than not that it’s the other way around. And so I think that’s where we really get into the timing issue of every month we’re seeing our caseloads increase in CalWORKs and CalFresh, and so that’s going to equate to a higher cost that we have out the door.”
Watts conceded that in recent months expenditures have exceeded revenues, but there’s a reason for that: CalWORKS and CalFresh caseloads are increasing as the economy slips into recession. She agreed it seemed unlikely that enough revenue would come in to cover the $7 million due Oct. 31, but noted that last September, revenue was $16 million. Coincidentally that was the same amount in the social services fund balance, now reduced to negative $5 million.
“So it sounds like to me that if, on average, we’re basically in the hole $1 million a month on this,” Watts said. “We need to figure out how to cut $1 million per month out of the budget.”
“Is that fair in terms of trying to get to break even?” Plummer asked.
“That is a fair assessment,” Watts said. “And that’s something that we’ll be working on as we get into our mid-year review. Our team is working on our manual accruals. And so if I come back before the board next month, I’ll be able to provide a little bit more of a sense of how we ended fiscal year 24-25.”
District 2 Supervisor Allen Long added more bad vibes to the party.
“My concern is that this is an ongoing problem and it’s long term and we’re gonna have to figure out a solution,” Long said. “And as you had said, the first time this came before our board this spring, as the economy slows and recession sets in, the need for services go up and the funding may be problematic. So we’re facing kind of an existential crisis in this arena, in my opinion. And so I would encourage that we look for any kind of a long term solution. I guess the question I would pose would be, what happens when this just kind of breaks?”
No one attempted to answer the question. Crye, who stated he wanted less families to be on the childcare program, asked Plummer to make a motion.
“I’ll make a motion to approve this request and to, and I don’t know if this needs to be two motions or one, but I’ll make it as one and then can be corrected,” Plummer said. “And to bring back by the October 31st a preliminary plan for how to cut $1 million per month from this social services fund budget.”
The motion passed 4-0 and Crye was in full gloat.
“Look at you, man, succinct, knocking it out of the park!” he complimented Plummer.
With another dismal job report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics dropping on Tuesday as Trump’s tariff economy continues to slouching towards stagflation, time will tell if cutting benefits for the poorest families in Shasta County right when they need them the most was a wise decision.
SCOREBOARD
REGULAR CALENDAR
Senior Staff Services Analyst Carrie Taylor is your Shasta County Employee of the Month for September.
Board Matters
R1 Adopt a resolution which recognizes Carrie Taylor, Senior Staff Services Analyst – Confidential with the Department of Support Services as Shasta County’s Employee of the Month for September 2025.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Score: The Board voted 4-0 to recognize Carrie Taylor as employee of the month. Here’s Taylor’s work bio:
Carrie Taylor started her career with Shasta County as an Office Assistant III in 2008. Since then, she has promoted through various roles to her current assignment as a Senior Staff Services Analyst – Confidential within the Support Services Department. Carrie has proven herself to be the epitome of a public servant based on her proven quality customer service, ethical standards, professionalism, and teamwork.
Carrie leads her team by example, always striving for excellence, with a supportive attitude. She is an inspiring supervisor managing an extremely high workload with excellence and patience. She analyzes tasks to find the most effective solution and changes course when responsibilities shift with determination and poise. Even on the toughest days she displays humility, humor, and dignity, modeling resilience and dedication to those she supervises and Support Services Department as a whole.
Carrie is not only committed to her own professional development, but actively encourages growth within her unit. She creates and fosters an environment of respect and understanding by prioritizing biweekly one-on-ones, making the time to check in with her staff and actively listen so she can provide the necessary tools for her team to attain their full potential.
She also ensures every person that interacts with her team is served with the same level of professionalism that she herself provides. Whether she is greeting or serving clients at the front counter, streamlining processes within the unit, or interacting with department contacts, Carrie has proven herself to be a great resource for the entire county that can be trusted with accurate, sensitive and confidential information.
For the reasons stated above, the Employee Recognition Committee recommends Carrie Taylor, Senior Staff Services Analyst – Confidential, in the Shasta County Department of Support Services be selected as the Employee of the Month for September 2025
R2 Receive an update from the County Executive Officer on County issues and consider action on specific legislation related to Shasta County’s legislative platform and receive Supervisors’ reports on countywide issues.
No Additional General Fund Impact
No Vote
R3 Adopt a proclamation which designates September 17-23, 2025, as “Constitution
Week” in Shasta County (Sponsored by Supervisor Kelstrom).
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Score: 4-0.
R4 Receive a presentation from Doug Bond, Amity Foundation President and Chief Executive Officer regarding Amity’s Male Community Reentry Program and consider providing direction to staff (Sponsored by Supervisor Crye).
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Score: The Board voted 4-0 to request a proposal from Amnity Foundation to provided residential re-entry services to low level inmates as part of the Alternative Custody Program.
Agricultural Commissioner/Sealer of Weights and Measures
R5 Receive a presentation from the Agricultural Commissioner/Sealer of Weights and Measures regarding the 2024 Shasta County Crop and Livestock Report.
No Additional General Fund Impact
No Vote
Health and Human Services Agency-Economic Mobility
R6 Approve a retroactive renewal agreement with Shasta County Office of Education (SCOE) for the administration of state mandated child care and education services for the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Program (CalWORKs) in an amount not to exceed $4,860,060.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Score: The Board voted 4-0 to approve the renewal agreement and ordered staff to propose $1 million in budget cuts by Oct. 31.
Health and Human Services Agency-Administration
R9 Approve a General Fund loan extension, in accordance with Government Code Section 25214.4(b), to be repaid by October 31, 2025, along with interest at the Treasurer’s pool rate, within the Social Services Fund (0140) to cover actual negative cash balance in an amount not to exceed $7,000,000.
General Fund Impact
4/5 Vote
Score: 4-0.
CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT
There were no reportable actions from closed session.
R7 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54957.6):
Agency Negotiators:
County Executive Officer David Rickert
Personnel Director Monica Fugitt
Chief Labor Negotiator Gage Dungy, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
Employee Organizations:
Professional Peace Officers Association
R8 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Government Code section 54956.9, subdivision (d), paragraph (2)):
Significant Exposure to Litigation: one potential case.
At the conclusion of the Closed Session, reportable action, if any, will be reported in Open Session.
REPORT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS ADJOURN
CONSENT CALENDAR
The Board passed the 19 items on the Consent Calendar passed unanimously 4-0.
County Administrative Office
C1 Adopt a resolution which: (1) Finds a portion of Assessor Parcel Number 207-110- 039 (“Premises”) not required for public use and exempt from the Surplus Lands Act; (2) authorizes the lease of the Premises; (3) approves the form of lease for auction; (4) directs the County Administrative Office to advertise for bids for the right to lease the Premises; and (5) authorizes the opening of bids on or after September 17, 2025, at 1:00 p.m.
No Additional General Fund Impact
4/5 Vote Board of Supervisors
C2 Approve a letter to Congressman Doug LaMalfa regarding the impacts of current Investment Tax Credits on local communities, including the Fountain Wind Project in Shasta County and authorize the County Executive Officer, or their designee, to submit revised letters on the Board’s behalf, unless changes substantially alter its intent or affect the Board’s position. (Sponsored by Supervisor Crye).
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C3 Approve a community survey to gather feedback regarding possible additions to the
Shasta County Charter (Sponsored by Supervisor Crye).
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Clerk of the Board
C4 Appoint Randy Fields to the Buckeye Fire Protection District to serve the remainder of
a four-year term to December 4, 2026.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C5 Appoint Kevin Davis to the Burney Basin Mosquito Abatement District Board of
Trustees to serve the remainder of a two-year term to January 5, 2026.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C6 Approve an amendment to the 2025 Board of Supervisors’ meeting calendar and approve a calendar for January 2026 meetings.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C7 Take the following actions regarding letters of position on pending legislation: (1) Approve: (a) letter of support for Assembly Bill 411: Livestock carcasses: disposal: composting; (b) a letter of support for Senate Bill 346: Short-Term Rental Facilitator Act of 2025; and (c) a letter of opposition for Assembly Bill 793: Potentially Dangerous and Vicious Dogs: Designation and Disposition; Burden of Proof; and (2) authorize the County Executive Officer, or their designee, to submit revised letters on the Board’s behalf as the bills are amended, unless changes substantially alter its intent or affect the Board’s position.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Health and Human Services Agency-Behavioral Health and Social Services
C8 Approve an agreement with Tehama County Community Action Agency for youth wraparound services.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C9 Approve a retroactive renewal agreement with Willow Glen Care Center for residential mental health treatment services in an amount not to exceed $1,900,000.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C10 Approve a retroactive renewal agreement with Willow Glen Care Center for mental health rehabilitation services at Sequoia Psychiatric Treatment Center and Cedar Grove Care Home locations in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C11 Approve a retroactive amendment to the agreement with St. Helena Hospital, dba Adventist Health Vallejo, for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization services which replaces the reimbursement addendum and increases the maximum compensation.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C12 Approve the 2023 Mental Health, Alcohol, and Drug Advisory Board (MHADAB) annual report.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Health and Human Services Agency-Economic Mobility
C13 Adopt a resolution which designates authority to the Health and Human Services Agency Director, or their designee, to sign the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Round 6 (HHAP-6) agreement, and any documents specific to HHAP-6, including retroactive, with the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Health and Human Services Agency-Public Health
C14 Approve a revenue agreement with California Department of Public Health (“CDPH”) to fund the Women Infants and Children (“WIC”) Supplemental Nutrition Program (“Agreement”) in the amount of $6,535,502 and designate authority to the Health and Human Services Agency Director, or their designee, to sign required documents or any amendments related to the Agreement, including retroactive.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C15 Adopt a proclamation which designates October 2025 as “Breast Cancer Awareness Month” in Shasta County.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
C16 Approve a retroactive annual funding allocation application with the California Department of Public Health for the Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program and designate signing authority to the Health and Human Services Agency Director, or their designee, to sign prospective and retroactive documents, agreements, and approvals tied to this funding allocation.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
Probation
C17 Approve an agreement with Remi Vista, Inc., for sex offender treatment services to youth offenders.
No Additional General
Fund Impact Simple Majority Vote
Public Works
C18 Approve budget amendments which: (1) Increase appropriations and revenue by: (a) $154,999 in the Land Buildings and Improvements Budget (BU 166); (b) $109,333 in the District Attorney Budget (BU 227); and (c) $45,666 in the Sheriff Budget (BU 235); and (2) increase appropriations by $154,999 in the Accumulated Capital Outlay Budget (BU 161) offset by use of General Purpose Assigned fund balance in BU 161, for the “Roofing Membrane Replacement at Various Locations Project.”
No Additional General Fund Impact
4/5 Vote
Sheriff-Jail
C19 Approve an agreement with Solano County to house Shasta County inmates in the Solano County Jail Facility.
No Additional General Fund Impact
Simple Majority Vote
