Hauling Ash: Does Sen. Brian Dahle Have A Conflict Of Interest?

Senator Brian Dahle and his truck, from www.briandahle.com.

In the summer of 2016, the small mountain village of Burney, 53 miles east of Redding, was on the brink of economic ruin.

Earlier that year, Burney Forest Power, the 30-year-old, 31 MW biomass energy facility just outside of town, announced the rate its main customer, Pacific Gas & Electric, was willing to pay for electricity was not high enough to profitably run the power plant.

Therefore, the facility was shutting down, putting not just Burney Forest Power’s relatively small number of employees out of a work, but hundreds of workers at the nearby Shasta Green sawmill, which supplies the power plant with woody biomass in exchange for electricity to run the mill and steam to cure boards.

The potential loss of hundreds of good-paying jobs might have been a lethal blow to Burney’s already fragile rural economy and its 3154 residents. A wave of layoffs was set to begin when then-1st District Assemblyman Brian Dahle rode to the rescue in late August.

Dahle, a climate change skeptic who normally votes against environmental legislation, inserted an amendment into a senate climate bill, SB 859, that allocated millions of dollars from the state’s cap-and-trade greenhouse gas reduction fund to subsidize electricity rates for biomass plants that obtain a majority of their fuel from high fire hazard forests.

“Once they shut down, they don’t come back,” Dahle told the LA Times in a feature published shortly before the bill was passed. The story book-ended on Burney Forest Power’s potential closing and its possible effects on Burney.

Asked by the Times if it was hypocritical for an opponent of the state’s cap-and-trade program to now seek funding from it, Dahle answered:

“If you’re going to ask me to vote for something, wouldn’t you spend some of the money to show me what you’re going to do with it? I think it’s kind of hard to use the whip all the time. Sometimes you need to use the carrot.”

Shortly after SB 859 passed, Dahle took a victory lap in the Redding Record Searchlight for saving Burney an estimated (by his office) 275 jobs.

“We went to see the Burney Forest Power and saw what they are accomplishing,” Dahle said. “Without the provisions of SB 859, the biomass industry cannot compete with wind or solar power. We need to make them competitive.”

Burney Mountain Power, courtesy U.S. Forest Service.

Show Him The Money

But missing from both the Times and Record Searchlight stories was one interesting fact: For the past 15 years, Burney Forest Power has paid Dahle’s trucking company hundreds of thousands of dollars to haul ash from its incinerator.

According to annual statement-of-interest reports Dahle has filed with the California Fair Political Practices Commission dating back to his days as a Lassen County Supervisor, his Big Valley Seed Company/Trucking Company makes “over $100,000” annually. More than $10,000 of that annual income—it could be considerably more—has come from one primary customer: Burney Forest Power.

If the biomass plant had shut down, Dahle would have lost one of his trucking company’s most valuable customers. His timely legislative intervention kept Burney Forest Power’s dynamo humming and his [LINK] trucking company’s solitary big-rig rolling.

It would seem that when Dahle told the Times the state’s cap-and-trade program needs to show him the money, he meant literally, show him the money. Suddenly, his supposedly hypocritical stance comes into sharper relief: He’s got skin in the game.

Dahle’s been chasing the same economic carrot since 2015, when he introduced AB 590, legislation that sought to subsidize biomass energy with greenhouse gas reduction funds. That bill stalled, so he inserted similar language into SB 859 the following year.

In doing so, Dahle may have violated the FPPC’s conflict of interest regulations, which state:

“A public official at any level of state or local government has a prohibited conflict of interest and may not make, participate in making, or in any way use or attempt to use his or her official position to influence a governmental decision when he or she knows or has reason to know he or she has a disqualifying financial interest.”

In June, Dahle won the special election to replace outgoing 1st District Senator Ted Gaines, a conservative Republican who reliably voted against the Dahle-ammended SB 859. Now Megan Dahle, the senator’s wife, is running in the August 27 special election for his former Assembly seat.

In her statement-of-interest filed with the FPPC, Megan Dahle lists herself as the co-owner of Big Valley Seed Company/Trucking Company.

Excerpt from Megan Dahle campaign flier that just came in the author’s mail.

Dahle Denies Conflict Of Interest

Dahle’s familiarity with what Burney Forest Power is “accomplishing” wasn’t based on a recent visit, as he suggested in the Record Searchlight. He’s been hauling ash for them for 15 years, he admitted in a telephone interview from his home in Bieber last Friday.

The politician who continually touts his status as a farmer/small business owner besieged by government bureaucrats and regulations—most recently at the controversial Faith and Values Town Hall in Redding—first told me that he doesn’t usually discuss his businesses. I asked him about Big Valley Seed Company/Trucking Company’s relationship with Burney Forest Power.

“We do trucking for them, for 15 years,” Dahle said. “We do trucking for other people too.”

None of those other people are listed on the senator’s FPPC forms before 2017, when Santa Rosa-based Pacific Biochar Benefit Corporation joined Burney Forest Power as the only clients paying more than $10,000 annually to the Dahles’ trucking company.

It appears hauling biomass incinerator ash is a major part of the Dahles’ trucking business. Fly ash must be disposed of in landfills. But bottom ash and biochar can be used in agricultural applications. In the case of biochar, it can be an effective way of storing carbon in the ground, instead of burning it completely and releasing it into the atmosphere.

“We put it on our farms,” Dahle said. “We do it both ways. It depends on what the haul is. They pay me to haul. We’ve hauled for others over the years, like Sierra Pacific.”

The FPPC’s conflict of interest rules state “a public official has a financial interest in any person from whom he or she has received income, including commission income and incentive compensation, aggregating $500 or more within 12 months prior to the time when the relevant governmental decision is made.”

When asked if his business relationship with Burney Forest Power represented a conflict of interest prohibiting him from working on legislation in its behalf, Dahle first said, “It wasn’t my bill,” which is true in the case of SB 859, to which he tacked on an amendment. But AB 590 the year before was his bill.

“AB 590 was a bill I worked on to get the biomass industry out of the woods,” Dahle said. He added that he consulted with the Legislative Counsel before working on the bill. “The Legislative Counsel said it impacts all the biomass facilities in California, so I don’t have a conflict of interest.”

Technically, SB 859 does apply to the 26 biomass plants currently online in the state. But realistically, the bill mandates that the state’s large investor-owned utilities like PG&E collectively purchase 146 MW from facilities that burn forest debris from high-fire threat areas as their primary fuel. That shortens the list to just six, including Burney Forest Power.

Detail of Brian Dahle’s 2018 statement-of-interest to FPPC showing business relationship with Burney Forest Power.

Contours Of A Conflict

The biomass energy plant on Burney’s outskirts has been burning an increasing amount of slash and forest debris since Gov. Jerry Brown declared a Tree Mortality crisis in 2015.

An estimated 127 million dead trees, mostly in the southern Sierra Nevada, have been killed by insect infestation and drought during the past decade. At the same time, much of the state’s 33 million acres of forest is a tinderbox of bone-dry undergrowth caused by decades of fire suppression, particularly in the wildland-urban interface.

Burney Forest Power, which did not respond to my inquiries by phone and email, is just one of six facilities currently participating in the Bioenergy Renewable Auction Mechanism, known as the BioRAM program. It was established after Brown’s emergency order, modified by SB 859 and administered by the California Public Utilities Commission.

The six plants, which also includes Wheelabrator Shasta in Anderson, provided collectively 153 MW of electricity to investor owned utilities in 2017, according to the CPUC’s 2018 report on the state’s renewable portfolio standards. That’s in excess of the 146 MW mandated by SB 859.

Burney Forest Power, which sits near the edge of a high fire-threat forest, doesn’t face the substantial costs associated with trucking dead trees and forest debris to facilities more centrally located. Dahle should have reasonably known that the company he’s been doing business with for 15 years would benefit greatly from his legislative efforts, which in turn would benefit him financially.

That ticks off boxes five and six on the FPPC’s 8-point check list for potential conflicts of interest. With his claim that his legislative efforts were on behalf of the entire biomass industry, Dahle seems to be relying on check-point seven, “Is the potential effect of the governmental decision on the public official’s economic interests distinguishable from its effect on the general public?”

If we confine that question to Burney, it’s fair to say Dahle benefited no more than many employees and businesses dependent on Burney Forest Power staying in operation. The same can be said for other communities outside his district where biomass plants have remained in operation.

But as an assemblyman and now a senator, Dahle’s “general public” is much broader than just Burney and the biomass energy industry. It’s the million or so constituents of the 1st District.

“For a conflict of interest to be avoided, the official’s interest must be affected in substantially the same manner as the interests of all members of the group that is determined to constitute a significant segment,” states the FPPC. “If the interests of some members of the significant segment will be affected differently from the interests of others, the official may not avoid disqualification.”

Is it in the best interest of all Dahle’s constituents to subsidize biomass energy? It could play an important role in the state’s struggle to prepare for an increasingly warm future, but not without a substantial investment in new facilities and technology, including carbon storage. Burney would be an ideal location for such a Green New Deal investment.

In a CalMatters op-ed last year, CPUC president Michael Picker acknowledged the biomass energy industry’s future role, but cautioned against significantly expanding the industry to respond to the tree mortality crisis and the wildfires that raged across the north state the past several years.

“Building a new sustainable forestry industry in the Sierra and Siskiyou mountains could make biomass facilities more effective as part of a whole array of fire prevention tools, as well as offering jobs and economic development in those communities,” Picker wrote. “But on its own, biomass is a limited fire prevention tool and will require extensive ratepayer subsidies. Even with subsidies, biomass may not work as an effective fire-prevention tool outside pine forests.”

It seems unlikely that Dahle, a fiscal conservative who’s up for reelection in 2020, would support the sort of massive public investment required to make biomass energy viable.

That would require a politician who believes that anthropogenic climate change is an existential threat to humanity and that government can actually solve some problems. The same goes for whoever replaces Dahle in the Assembly in the August 27 special election.

In the meantime, Burney gets to live another day, until Burney Forest Power’s current BioRAM agreement expires in 2021, and the negotiations start all over again.

Dahle told me that transparency in government is important. That’s why he files those statement-of-interest forms with the FPPC documenting his longstanding business relationship with Burney Mountain Power.

But when asked if he should have mentioned that longstanding relationship to the half-dozen journalists who wrote stories portraying him as a small town’s savior back in 2016, the senator was emphatic.

“No!” he said.

Dahle said he’d send me a copy of the Legislative Council’s decision proving he didn’t have a conflict of interest on Monday. I invited both him and his wife to comment further on their business relationship with Burney Mountain Power if they wished.

Instead, on Monday I got no copy of the Legislative Council’s decision and an email from Sen. Dahle’s chief-of-staff, John F.W. Cook.

“Senator Dahle is a seed farmer, as such he works with other businesses in the Big Valley area,” Cook wrote. “All of these business interactions are disclosed to the public each year and are available on the internet. We are very careful in all of our efforts to comply with the law and be transparent to the public. When concerns arise about potential conflicts of interest, our office seeks the advice of the Legislative Ethics office and other legal professionals. Senator Dahle abides 100 percent by the highest standards of ethical conduct and transparency.”

Cook is correct about at least one thing. The Dahles’ business connection with Burney Forest Power has been a matter of public record for years, for those who have the time and the patience to search for it on the FPPC’s website.

But the general public? It looks like most of them just found out.

R.V. Scheide
R.V. Scheide has been a northern California journalist for more than 20 years. He appreciates your comments and story ideas. He can be emailed at RVScheide@anewscafe.com.
Comment Policy: We welcome your comments, with some caveats: Please keep your comments positive and civilized. If your comment is critical, please make it constructive. If your comment is rude, we will delete it. If you are constantly negative or a general pest, troll, or hater, we will ban you from the site forever. The definition of terms is left solely up to us. Comments are disabled on articles older than 90 days. Thank you. Carry on.

34 Responses

  1. Avatar Tim says:

    Trucking is a low margin business. “Grosses over $100,000” is not the same as “makes over $100,000” — big fleets do well to earn a 5-10% profit margin. Small companies are ecstatic with a 20% margin. So “grosses over $100k” means more like “makes over $20k” after paying his 2 drivers and maintaining his 10 year old Peterbilt.

    The real/big conflicts are usually masked by spouses: Diane Feinstein’s husband won a $1 billion contract for CA’s high speed rail & Gavin Newsom’s wife’s virtually unknown film production company gets hundreds of thousands in “sponsorships” from mega corporations like Microsoft & Unilever. Both pale in comparison to the way the Clintons sold access via “donations” to their Foundation.

    • R.V. Scheide R.V. Scheide says:

      Tim you have absolutely no idea how much Dahle’s trucking firm grosses, other than it’s over $100,000. Even if you minimize it as you are, it still easily exceeds the threshold for conflict of interest. Bringing up Feinstein and Blum who are indeed crooked as all get-out, is just deflection.

      • Avatar Anita Brady says:

        Yep! Deflection and spin are the name of the game for one wide swath of the political world.

      • Avatar Tim says:

        I’m a part owner in a trucking company – I know more about the industry than most. I don’t know precisely how much Dahle’s 1 truck operation makes, but I know it would do well to gross $200k and profit $40k if running full time. And I suspect from the seasonality of his random DOT inspections that Dahle isn’t running his truck all year.

        I also know that if it were doing that well, he’d probably have more than 1 truck, probably be running equipment made this decade, and probably be running at least some interstate freight instead of intrastate only. Instead, all evidence points to a local AG company with a truck used primarily for their seed business – but one that also picks up some local side work.

        I also know that anyone a trucking company hauls for might look suspect if the owner was in politics. Pepsi, Sierra Pacific, Knauff, PG&E, etc – can you name a north state company that moves a lot of freight that doesn’t have regular business with the legislature? So the question is, do his constituents support biomass in Burney? And I’d say the answer is overwhelmingly yes – unless you’re talking about the people who oppose whatever he does because he was the one doing it.

        PS: If you’re interested in digging for local conflicts of interest involving real money, I’d suggest putting aside the anti bethel & anti republican crusade and looking closely at all the real estate developments ex-mayor Brent Weaver is involved in. Sure is interesting how much involved prime productive private land that became cheap after the city became entangled in the operations – and how often his developments are granted significant variances in code…

        • R.V. Scheide R.V. Scheide says:

          Reality Check Tim: They’re all Republicans up here. If there was a Democrat doing the same thing, I’d write about that too.

          It doesn’t matter one jot what you know about the trucking industry. What matters is the rule of law, which looks like it was broken here.

          • Avatar Common Sense says:

            Republicans are not really concerned with the facts R.V.! The Facts are we have a 5150 in the White House based on actions alone. But not one of the 40% of his followers will believe that.

            Tim is just showing us what most all Republicans do, which is to deflect and to start talking about the Clinton’s or what the Democrat’s do also etc. But Tim does it at a much higher level as he is Obviously and Educated Man. Steve used to point out all the logic when he was more involved in discussions but I am guessing he has tired of playing the professor role and needs to find more stimulation else where as few are as smart as he is in debates.
            So we are at the point now where the GOP ers don’t really care about Morals or Ethics as long as it pads the bottom line. They can turn their heads when Racist Statements are made by one in charge if it benefits their cause or helps stack the courts or save some babies or will lead to the good old days of Rich White Guys in charge of everything.

            The Typical Set up and Response when talking with a Republican:

            Trump has lied OVER 10,000 times. Response: The Democrats Lied also.All Politicians Lie.

            Trumps Tariffs will put the Country in Recession.
            Response: The Democrats have put the Country into Recession also.

            The President gladly accepted help from a Hostile Foreign Power to win the Election.
            Response: They all do.

            Trump Cheated on every wife he ever had.
            Response: So did Clinton

            Trump still owes the city of El Paso over $500k which he says he isn’t going to pay for his Campaign stop as they “Over Charged him”.
            Response: Good for him at least he stood up for himself!

            Morals,Values and Integrity.They don’t know party lines!

      • Avatar Linda Cooper says:

        R.V. – I so look forward to reading your articles. And thank you for the reply to Tim. When I read his post, my thought was why go there? In doesn’t make sense. The article is about Dahle. I was reminded of Trump, who blames Obama and everyone else instead of focusing on current events. Deflection. It’s a word.

    • Steve Towers Steve Towers says:

      Classic whataboutism, Tim. Not absolutely clueless and witless Sean Hannity whataboutism, but whataboutism nonetheless.

  2. Avatar christian gardinier says:

    Wow…. Another great work of true Investigative Journalism! That’s R.V.!

  3. Avatar Randy says:

    Take a Google Earth tour from Mt. Shasta down the Sierra Nevada range and witness the rampant destruction to our native ecology and our life giving biosphere. Consider that this attack on our biosphere is being subsidized by all of us for the financial benefit of a few.

    “Biodiversity is critical for safeguarding global food security, underpinning healthy and nutritious diets, improving rural livelihoods, and enhancing the resilience of people and communities,” FAO’s Director-General José Graziano da Silva said in a statement. “Less biodiversity means that plants and animals are more vulnerable to pests and diseases. Compounded by our reliance on fewer and fewer species to feed ourselves, the increasing loss of biodiversity for food and agriculture puts food security and nutrition at risk.”

    https://e360.yale.edu/digest/biodiversity-loss-is-endangering-food-security-un-warns

    • Avatar Anita Brady says:

      Google Earth is so important but depressing at the same time.

    • R.V. Scheide R.V. Scheide says:

      Randy, that’s relevant to the policies the state chooses as we struggle to adapt to the climate crisis, and when we take such a wide, holistic view, it’s difficult to see how burning trees for energy fits into it. While the biomass energy industry claims it’s carbon neutral, that’s only over time, it take 30 t0 50 years of tree growth for the equation to balance out. As many reports this year alone have stated, we don’t have 30 to 50 years.

      • Avatar Randy says:

        Our forest managment plans need to be designed by professional environmental biologists with the specific intent to maintain the ecological integrity of our biosphere and timber interests need to be kept completely out of this design process. Once such a plan has been created the timber industry can be offered to participate within the guidlines of the plan. If the main timber corporations do not want to participate there are countless small scale timber contractors who would be glad to take the job.

  4. Avatar Bill Newton says:

    So Tim is saying if Democrats do it , it is bigger. If Republicans do it on a small scale, then that is OK. Tim speaks with forked tongue.

  5. Avatar Viktoria Peterson says:

    Randy, Are those brownish patches all over the land evidence of the deforestation?

    • Avatar Randy says:

      Each of those ‘patches’ have been first sterilized of all native species with toxic herbicides which the timber corporations get to ‘self monitor’ for any ill effects on the environment, which has just been killed. Once dead the biomass is cut and piled by all terrain brushing machines equip with circular saws and grapples like giant lawn mowers. The biomass is then chipped and hauled to the company co-gen plants and turned into electricity. Any timber is then felled and hauled to the mill. Next the areas are ripped by large bull dozers which pile the stumps and remains of the forest into giant, apartment sized piles and burned. Next the areas are replanted with single species trees of unknown genetics. After 5 years or the replanted seedlings reach a height of 5′ they can then clearcut the areas in between those tree farms. You can notice some scant, house sized remnants of tree patches withing the dead zones and those are proudly called “wildlife retention areas” and this mass eradication of our biosphere is fully suppoted by our Department of Fish and Wildlife which has never conducted a single study as to how this mass eradication of wildlife habitat is effecting wilfdlife.

  6. Avatar Randy says:

    Our forest managment plans need to be designed by professional environmental biologists with the specific intent to maintain the ecological integrity of our biosphere and timber interests need to be kept completely out of this design process. Once such a plan has been created the timber industry can be offered to participate within the guidlines of the plan. If the main timber corporations do not want to participate there are countless small scale timber contractors who would be glad to take the job.

    • Joanne Snyder Joanne Snyder says:

      I’ve read the history of the Red River Lumber Company. My mother-in-law was born in the company town of Westwood. All lumber companies are not the same. Many of past practices were based on “get what’s good and get out” with no consideration for the consequences. We’re in a different era and I hope like you say, that small scale contractors can stay in business by abiding by guidelines based on avoiding what the “robber barons” did so wrong.

  7. Terry Turner Terry Turner says:

    I am without words. Thank you for the excellent research and writing on this piece! Well done.

  8. Avatar lee iggd says:

    Excellent article, but do you think it will matter to the voters in this part of the state? After all they have been voting for the master of public handouts Doug LaMalfa for years. As long as the proper dog whistles are sounded in advance the rest is ok

    • R.V. Scheide R.V. Scheide says:

      We have to convince people that there’s a better way than these austerity conservatives that suck up subsidies for themselves, and leave the district high and dry.

  9. Avatar Robert Scheide Sr. says:

    I suppose it is unreasonable to expect any congressman to obey the rules. It is also unreasonable to think any will voice of dissent. You have seen what happens when the SQUAD voiced their complaints they were attacked as Treasonists, communists, and worse.

    We need to flush the congressman who votes against our interests most of the time. If we don’t take the Senate back and we are foolish enough to reelect Trump our democracy is gone. So all you Trumpees try for once to mark a d for President and your congressman and save the country.

  10. Avatar Steve Murray says:

    Jeez, yet another ethically challenged northstate republican politician. Imagine that!!
    Folks, what we are seeing from R.V. is world class investigative journalism time and again. We are surpassingly lucky readers, and I might expect R.V. to be poached by a national news/ journalism source. I sure hope not, but will not be surprised.

  11. Avatar Amy Curran says:

    Excellent article. Thanks R. V.

  12. Avatar David Ledger says:

    Excellent investigative journalism!!!

    The Shasta Group of Sierra Club will be presenting Daniel Barad from the California Sierra Club to speak in Redding on September 25 specifically about biomass plants in California and will bring into focus the good and bad of biomass electricity generation plants. While he will be covering all of California, he will bring into focus our local biomass plants and the subsidies they receive. He has been studying and speaking about biomass plants for several years. This will be at the Redding Public Library Community Room starting at 6 pm prompt. Doors open at 5:30 and the event is free to the public.

  13. Avatar Philip Damask says:

    An interesting article. It points out one of the problems anyone who ownes a business has when he also holds a political position. He should have been more forth coming about his business had a relationship with one of the biomass plants.
    A couple of other points would have been of interest to me. The economics of boimass compared to the highly subsidized wind and solar power our elected representatives are forcing on this state. A second point would be how does biomass fit in with AOC’s green new deal. Would these plants be shut down?